Re: 205:A

From: Andre Engels (engels_at_uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 05:01:49 PST


On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Steve Gardner wrote:

> Round 205: PROPOSAL A
>
> For the duration of Round 205, Regular Ordinance 6 is amended to read:
>
>     6. Judge.  The Judge is responsible for interpreting the ordinances
>        and determining the validity of fantasy rules. If a fantasy rule
>        is inconsistent with itself, or the regular ordinances, then the
>        Judge shall declare that rule invalid or unsuccessful. If a
>        fantasy rule is inconsistent with a previously posted fantasy rule
>        or rules, then the Judge shall declare the rule to be valid if
>        and only if it has higher precedence than the rule or rules with
>        which it is in conflict, according to the rules for determining
>        precedence then in force.

I vote FOR.

Andre Engels

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-20 13:01:50 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST