From: Andre Engels (engels_at_uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 05:01:49 PST
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Steve Gardner wrote: > Round 205: PROPOSAL A > > For the duration of Round 205, Regular Ordinance 6 is amended to read: > > 6. Judge. The Judge is responsible for interpreting the ordinances > and determining the validity of fantasy rules. If a fantasy rule > is inconsistent with itself, or the regular ordinances, then the > Judge shall declare that rule invalid or unsuccessful. If a > fantasy rule is inconsistent with a previously posted fantasy rule > or rules, then the Judge shall declare the rule to be valid if > and only if it has higher precedence than the rule or rules with > which it is in conflict, according to the rules for determining > precedence then in force. I vote FOR. Andre Engels -- Rule Date: 2003-03-20 13:01:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST