Re: 205:1

From: Andre Engels (engels_at_uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 05:00:30 PST


On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Steve Gardner wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Andre Engels wrote:
>
> > 1) If no other rule determines the precedence between two Rules, the Rule
> >    with the lowest number has precedence.
> > 2) In order to keep this rule effective, no other rule or combination of
> >    rules may determine or try to determine every possible case of precedence.
>
> Andre, this submission is datestamped nearly 9 hours after 205:2, with
> which it seems to be inconsistent. Still, you labelled it '205:1' -
> should I assume you were unaware of the earlier postings?

No, if it is called 205:1 that is an accident, it should have been "Re: 205:1"
forgetting to change the title. It is intended as 205:3. I don't see why it
is inconsistent with 205:2 - the first clause is a precedence clause, the
second is not.

Andre Engels

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-20 13:01:00 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST