From: Andre Engels (engels_at_uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 05:00:30 PST
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Steve Gardner wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Andre Engels wrote: > > > 1) If no other rule determines the precedence between two Rules, the Rule > > with the lowest number has precedence. > > 2) In order to keep this rule effective, no other rule or combination of > > rules may determine or try to determine every possible case of precedence. > > Andre, this submission is datestamped nearly 9 hours after 205:2, with > which it seems to be inconsistent. Still, you labelled it '205:1' - > should I assume you were unaware of the earlier postings? No, if it is called 205:1 that is an accident, it should have been "Re: 205:1" forgetting to change the title. It is intended as 205:3. I don't see why it is inconsistent with 205:2 - the first clause is a precedence clause, the second is not. Andre Engels -- Rule Date: 2003-03-20 13:01:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST