Re: 204:10 VALID +1.5 Curses Foiled Again....

From: Joshua (j3b4_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 20:18:27 PST


Dagnabit!

I could been a wizzard, I coulda been sumbody, instead of a bum which
is whadiyam!

Those seven days sherdoo fly by when yer not looking.

~ Joshua

 --- Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com> wrote: > Steve Gardner
<gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> > > VALID.  I'm okay with a rule using a new form of change, so long
> as it
> > > explicitly requires or allows that form of change.
> > 
> > Can you confirm that the Rules was submitted within the available
> time?
> > It looked to be 2-3 hours late to me...
> 
> You're right, it was late, after accounting for Joshua losing a day
> of
> eligibility for the invalid 204:9.  Does this mean that the so-called
> 204:10 is actually not a rule at all?
> 
> In any case, Steve is the Judge and Wizard of Round 205.  I'll post a
> full report of Round 204 later when I'm not quite so busy.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com>          "I'm not sure I can go
> through
> http://members.fortunecity.com/emurphy/      with it.  Leave, I
> mean."
> 
> -- 
> Rule Date: 2003-03-19 03:50:01 GMT 

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-19 04:18:51 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST