From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:49:18 PST
Steve Gardner <gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au> wrote: > > VALID. I'm okay with a rule using a new form of change, so long as it > > explicitly requires or allows that form of change. > > Can you confirm that the Rules was submitted within the available time? > It looked to be 2-3 hours late to me... You're right, it was late, after accounting for Joshua losing a day of eligibility for the invalid 204:9. Does this mean that the so-called 204:10 is actually not a rule at all? In any case, Steve is the Judge and Wizard of Round 205. I'll post a full report of Round 204 later when I'm not quite so busy. -- Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com> "I'm not sure I can go through http://members.fortunecity.com/emurphy/ with it. Leave, I mean." -- Rule Date: 2003-03-19 03:50:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST