From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:07:02 PDT
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Joshua wrote: > I accuse all future rule posters in this round of cheating and unfair > play. Their rules must be dirty and underhanded, and though valid due > to nominal adherence to the regular ordinances and consistency with > previous rules, they all violate the spirit of those ordinances in one > way or another. > > I only hope that Steve will do his best to combat this unsportsmanlike > behavior by punishing you rule-breakers with many invalid judgments and > negative style-point awards. (In return he can expect lenient judgments > and lots of style points next time I'm the judge.) You may all think > I've "crossed the line" the line with this rule but I'll say you're all > "out" in left field. This ball's fair the there ain't nuthin' you can > do about it. Rule 211:1 Judgement: VALID Style: + 0.5 restriction on theme + 0.5 offers bribe to Judge, hence consistent with own restriction + 0.5 acceptance of bribe offered to Judge ;-> ===== + 1.5 TOTAL -- Steve Gardner | School of Computer Science | I've only just realized and Software Engineering | how self-conscious I am. gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST