From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 18:16:13 PDT
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 dallas368_at_comcast.net wrote: > [Rule 211:3] > > As noted in 211:1, future rule posters will use dirty and underhanded > tactics. As a concerned FRCer, I propose the following to prevent the > pathetic scum from (in my humble opinion) having any chance of winning > the round: All future rules that don't state "This rule is invalid." > are forbidden. > > [End Rule 211:3] Judgement: VALID Style: Nasssty. + 0.5 adheres to letter, counter to spirit of the rules + 0.5 is both dirty and underhanded - 0.5 slightly obvious ===== + 0.5 TOTAL -- Steve Gardner | School of Computer Science | I've only just realized and Software Engineering | how self-conscious I am. gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST