From: Alan Riddell (peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 00:16:38 PST
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Riddell" <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk> To: "Jonathan David Amery" <jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:35 AM Subject: Re: 201:2 VALID +1.0 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jonathan David Amery" <jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org> > To: "frc" <frc_at_trolltech.com> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:53 PM > Subject: 201:2 > > > Aucune règle VALIDE d'imagination n'est consistant avec toutes les > restrictions dans chacune des règles VALIDES précédentes d'imagination. > > Toutes les règles VALIDES d'imagination doivent avoir au moins trois > restrictions. > > Aucune règle VALIDE d'imagination ne peut être écrite dans la même > langue que la règle VALIDE d'imagination la précédant immédiatement. > > Aucune règle VALIDE d'imagination peut ne pas être par le même auteur > que la règle VALIDE d'imagination la précédant immédiatement. > > -- > Rule Date: 2003-01-24 16:53:19 GMT > > Assuming the translation is as follows. > > ==== > No VALID fantasy rule is consistent with all the restrictions in each > preceding VALID fantasy rule. > > All VALID fantasy rules must have at least three restrictions. > > No VALID fantasy rule may be written in the same language as the VALID > fantasy rule immediately preceding it. > > No VALID fantasy rule may be by the same author as the VALID fantasy > rule immediately preceding it. > ==== > > I am doing this in a rush so if you think there is anything I have missed > please let me know. > > Validity, the big question is if the rule "is inconsistent with itself, > previously posted valid fantasy rules, or the regular ordinances". And I am > going with what I should of stated when I Judged 201:1, that is I will take > for this round there to be a difference between being consistent with rules > and obeying (or being consistent with) restrictions. With that in mind this > rule is consistent with 201:1, itself and the ROs, and so is VALID. > > Style, the pattern has been set and this follows it in an obvious way. > Restrictions are reasonable for this point so +1.0 > > Judge Alan > -- Rule Date: 2003-01-28 08:16:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST