From: James Willson (jkvw3_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:43:20 PST
eh, why not
Overrule proposal 201.C:
For the duration of round 201, R.O. 6 and 6a shall be replaced with the
following:
6. Judge. The Judge is responsible for interpreting the ordinances
and determining the validity of fantasy rules. The Judge shall
declare a fantasy rule invalid or unsuccesful if any of the
following criteria are met:
a. The fantasy rule is inconsistent with itself
c. The fantasy rule is inconsistent with more than half of
previous valid fantasy rules
c. One or more valid fantasy rules have been previously posted,
and there is no set of rules consisting of the regular ordinances,
the fantasy rule, and all but one of the previously posted valid
fantasy rules which is consistent.
Otherwise e shall declare that rule valid.
6a. A fantasy rule can only be declared unsuccesful if it meets any of
the criteria above, but would not meet any of the criteria above
if it were not for the presence of any previously posted fantasy
rules for which it is reasonable to assume that the poster of the
rule had not seen them before e posted the rule.
I vote FOR this proposal.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
--
Rule Date: 2003-01-24 06:43:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST