Re: 200:5 INVALID +1.00

From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 20:30:59 PST


On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Steve Gardner wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) wrote:
> 
> > Validity: ... The Rule is NOT 200 characters (excluding whitespace)
> > long, it is 202 characters (excluding whitespace) long. 
> 
> Um, I make it 200 characters long. I calculated this by dumping the Rule
> into a vim editor, deleting all spaces the with ':%s/ //g', and using wc to
> count the characters. And I've double-checked by hand.

Hmm... You are correct. I checked again and came up with 200 characters
this time. In any case, the Rule still imposes a restriction on each Rule
that not every Rule follows.

-- 
Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-01-14 04:31:16 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST