From: Alan Riddell (peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 10:27:23 PST
Ok, I have decided 203:3 does not prevent rules from showing hands as such the rule is consistent with the ROs and previous valid rules. However, it would appear to impose the restriction that rules are not to "post bills" whilst itself showing a man placing a sign (bill?) against a wall. As such I am forced to find it INVALID. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Riddell" <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk> To: "frc" <frc_at_trolltech.com> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 12:03 PM Subject: 203:4 making my mind up > > I'm not sure what rule we're on, but this is to be the next one posted. > > 203:4 > > > Of course, I don't think that this is really going to work out, because > > unless we resort to signs in the pictures, finding valid interpretations > of > > subsequent pictures is fairly trivial. > > I was origionally thinking that it we would develope and use a pictographic > language, e.g. there would be a picture symbol for rule a picture symbol for > good a picture symbol for bad perhaps use of some normal symbols such as an > equals sign. However, my theme was ambiguous and it is awlays interesting to > see how people interperate these things. Maybe now people will try to use a > pictographic language in this round or maybe we can save it for another > round who knows... > > > RULE::: > > http://www.emotioneric.com/postingbills.jpg > > A copy of the picture has been attached. > > The Rule is a picture of a man holding a sign against a blue wall. The sign > says "ERIC RULES", however written directly onto the wall is the text "POST > NO BILLS". Both of the man's hands can be seen in the picture. > > I will save Judgement and style award on this rule until I have decided if > rule 203:3 prevents rules from containing hands. > > Judge Alan > -- Rule Date: 2003-02-24 18:27:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST