Fw: 203:3 VALID +1.2

From: Alan Riddell (peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 02:13:59 PST


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Riddell" <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk>
To: "Mark Nau" <nau_at_treyarch.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: 203:3 VALID +1.2


> Rule is a picture of two stick men. The men apear to be fighting, although
> it is unclear exactly what is going on the man on the left has
considerably
> shorter arms than the man on the right. Furthermore there is red dripping
> from the end of the left mans arms. I will assume he has lost his hands in
> some suitably brutal manner. (Further more the picture is titled
"nohands")
> Both men have their arms raised as if in some style of boxing. The man on
> the right either has hands at the ends of his arms or there is some detail
> on his face, it is hard to tell as the ends of his arms are over the
frount
> of his face. It could be that he has a nose.
>
> Validity: No problems with the ROs or 203:2 consistent with itself so
valid.
>
> Style: The picture itself is very appealing in a hand-drawn nearly
childish
> way, but obviously it has this gritty edge to it. It is unclear if the
rule
> places any restrictions on future rules, if you believe it does please let
> me know. Perhaps it is to indicate that rules should not contain hands in
> which case it might actually be inconsistent with itself as the man on the
> right appears to have hands. There is as far as I can tell no indication
> that only future rules should contain no hands. +1.2
>
> Judge Alan
>

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-02-23 10:14:17 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST