From: Alan Riddell (peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 02:13:59 PST
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Riddell" <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk> To: "Mark Nau" <nau_at_treyarch.com> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:13 AM Subject: Re: 203:3 VALID +1.2 > Rule is a picture of two stick men. The men apear to be fighting, although > it is unclear exactly what is going on the man on the left has considerably > shorter arms than the man on the right. Furthermore there is red dripping > from the end of the left mans arms. I will assume he has lost his hands in > some suitably brutal manner. (Further more the picture is titled "nohands") > Both men have their arms raised as if in some style of boxing. The man on > the right either has hands at the ends of his arms or there is some detail > on his face, it is hard to tell as the ends of his arms are over the frount > of his face. It could be that he has a nose. > > Validity: No problems with the ROs or 203:2 consistent with itself so valid. > > Style: The picture itself is very appealing in a hand-drawn nearly childish > way, but obviously it has this gritty edge to it. It is unclear if the rule > places any restrictions on future rules, if you believe it does please let > me know. Perhaps it is to indicate that rules should not contain hands in > which case it might actually be inconsistent with itself as the man on the > right appears to have hands. There is as far as I can tell no indication > that only future rules should contain no hands. +1.2 > > Judge Alan > -- Rule Date: 2003-02-23 10:14:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST