From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 08:49:57 PDT
Nathan Russell wrote: > > --On Monday, April 28, 2003 10:28 AM +0100 Jonathan David Amery > <jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org> wrote: > > >> Fourth, the incidence of spam is not high at all. > > > > Of the last 350 messages I've received from the list, 113 are spam > > (30 are talking about spam). > > > > 1/3 of the lists traffic being spam is really quite high, at least > > for the lists I'm on... > > Agreed... > > By the way, could someone let me know the status of rules 2 through, I > thinkm, 5? > > I've been a bad judge and lost track. I believe they're all VALID by timeout. The last rule I saw was by Ed Murphy on 2003-04-13, in which case the round has been over for just over a week. -Jesse -- Rule Date: 2003-04-28 15:50:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST