Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam...
From: Stephen Turner (sret1_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 09:48:57 PDT
- Next message: Ed Murphy: "Summary of Round 206 in progress"
- Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Maybe in reply to: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Stephen Turner writes:
> > Personally, I vote for staying, because it's too much hassle to move
> > -- but then I don't usually see the spam because I assassinate it
> > first.
>
> Risky, that, isn't it? Rules have been disguised as spam before.
>
Yes, it can happen. But I filter them into another mailbox, so if I suspect
a false positive I can go back and find it.
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than
the question of whether a submarine can swim." (Edsger W. Dijkstra)
--
Rule Date: 2003-04-09 16:49:07 GMT
- Next message: Ed Murphy: "Summary of Round 206 in progress"
- Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Maybe in reply to: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST