Re: Proposal 193:C

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 06:23:06 PDT

• Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Proposal 193:B"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Proposal 193:B"
• Maybe in reply to: Mark Nau: "Proposal 193:C"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Mark Nau <nau_at_treyarch.com> writes:

> Proposal 193:C
> It is proposed to strike proposal 193:A, since it was obviously in
> error.
>
> I vote FOR 193:C
>
> --
>
> -M
> mailto:nau_at_treyarch.com
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-09-19 05:12:09 GMT
>

I vote AGAINST this proposal.

--
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY

--
Rule Date: 2002-09-19 13:23:29 GMT

• Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Proposal 193:B"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Proposal 193:B"
• Maybe in reply to: Mark Nau: "Proposal 193:C"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST