Re: 197:6

From: nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 11:06:33 PST


--On Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:20 AM -0800 "Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)" 
<jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> wrote:

> On 26 Nov 2002, Richard S. Holmes wrote:
>
>> "Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)" <jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hmm... Well, we could probably spend the remainder of this round
>> > discussing the intricacies of this rule. Is there a restriction in it
>> > that I'm not seeing? I haven't decided yet... And how about that
>> > Chinese puzzle box? Is it an unopened box that needs opening (197:03)?
>> > If it is, that's quite a lengthy description to surpass (196:04).
>>
>> Or is it merely Unsuccessful?
>
> I don't believe 197:7 would be Unsuccessful, as I think it does meet the
> requirements of 197:6 by exchanging the gift certificate from 197:5 for
> some tangible goods.

So I assume you also believe 197:6 should be valid?

Nathan

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-26 19:07:08 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST