Re: 197:6

From: nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 10:56:46 PST


--On Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:09 AM -0500 "Richard S. Holmes" 
<rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu> wrote:

> "Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)" <jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> writes:
>
>> Hmm... Well, we could probably spend the remainder of this round
>> discussing the intricacies of this rule. Is there a restriction in it
>> that I'm not seeing? I haven't decided yet... And how about that Chinese
>> puzzle box? Is it an unopened box that needs opening (197:03)? If it is,
>> that's quite a lengthy description to surpass (196:04).
>
> Or is it merely Unsuccessful?

I'll deal with this when I take care of a lot of other FRC business - 
namely tomorrow.

Any opinions in the meantime?

Nathan
>
> --
> - Rich Holmes
>   Syracuse, NY
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-11-26 16:09:46 GMT
>

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-26 18:57:27 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST