Re: 196:10 (In)Valid +2.0

From: Tieka (cmhuston_at_mts.net)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 17:18:12 PST


on 11/19/02 8:57 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) at jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com
wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote:
> 
>> on 11/14/02 11:13 PM, Nathan Russell at nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu wrote:
>> 
>>> According to my interpretation of the F'rcyeh Tablets, we can save FRC
>>> from a cold and lonely death if we simply recall the joyous times we
>>> had in earlier rounds, such as round 69, 105, and 42...  all of which
>>> were far happier than the current time of boredom :(.  All future
>>> rules shall use smileys.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Rule Date: 2002-11-15 04:14:01 GMT
>> 
>> In consideration of the voting process, I will not determine the validity or
>> invalidity of this rule, as any such distinction may change depending upon
>> the final outcome of the many proposals. However, I will assign style
>> points. +1 for staying on theme, +1 for being new, +0.5 for a solid
>> restriction, and -0.5 for calling the current time boring. (86 emails for
>> this round is defenitely not boring). Total is +2.0
>> 
>> Tieka,
>> Judge, Wizard, and way too many other things
> 
> Was there a final validity judgement for this rule?

Because there was no specific judgement for this rule, it became valid by
default. There should be an email entitled Summary 2 that should explain
everything.

Tieka

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-20 02:19:58 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST