Re: Fw: Proposal 196:G

From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 15 2002 - 07:54:10 PST

• Next message: Jonathan David Amery: "196:10"
• Previous message: Leonhard, Christian: "RE: 196 Summary Part 2"
• In reply to: Alan Riddell: "Fw: Proposal 196:G"
• Next in thread: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "Re: Fw: Proposal 196:G"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Alan Riddell wrote:
>
> BTW I would like to point out that only the Eulogy has to be shorter NOT the
> entire rule or posting.

196:1's "Each future eulogy (er, rule) shall ..." arguably establishes
an equivalence between the two.

-Jesse

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-15 15:54:32 GMT

• Next message: Jonathan David Amery: "196:10"
• Previous message: Leonhard, Christian: "RE: 196 Summary Part 2"
• In reply to: Alan Riddell: "Fw: Proposal 196:G"
• Next in thread: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "Re: Fw: Proposal 196:G"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST