From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 11:59:10 PST
Alan Riddell wrote: > A Splitsplot[fyaphic spilt into parts by other text]splinksplonk shall never > have its description [The bracketed one] after it. > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-03-28 03:00:51 GMT VALID. What's the point? How many fyaphic words will be splitsplotsplinksplonk? Neither is it the case that a redefinition is likely to turn this into an interesting restriction. -1 The Judge -- Rule Date: 2002-03-28 19:58:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST