Judgement 180:2 VALID -1

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 11:59:10 PST


Alan Riddell wrote:

> A Splitsplot[fyaphic spilt into parts by other text]splinksplonk shall never
> have its description [The bracketed one] after it.
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-03-28 03:00:51 GMT

VALID.

What's the point? How many fyaphic words will be splitsplotsplinksplonk?
Neither is it the case that a redefinition is likely to turn this into an
interesting restriction. -1

The Judge

--
Rule Date: 2002-03-28 19:58:46 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST