Re: 179:A

From: Glenn Overby II (guardcaptain_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 10:52:08 PST

Next message: Aron Wall: "Re: 179:A"
Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: 179:A"
In reply to: Aron Wall: "179:A"
Next in thread: Aron Wall: "Re: 179:A"
Reply: Aron Wall: "Re: 179:A"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I also vote FOR proposal 179:A, which sounds like the most promising round start
in a while.  But won't it have to be re-proposed when the round begins?  I thought
that the round was to start with the posting of the first rule, and I don't think I missed
it.

:)

Glenn E. Overby II
Clinton Twp, MI, USA

--
Rule Date: 2002-03-14 18:52:50 GMT

Next message: Aron Wall: "Re: 179:A"
Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: 179:A"
In reply to: Aron Wall: "179:A"
Next in thread: Aron Wall: "Re: 179:A"
Reply: Aron Wall: "Re: 179:A"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST