From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:52:12 PDT
Anton Cox wrote: > > What the judge posted was not a rule, and hence does not need to be > interpreted using the conventions adopted in the ROs. Surely that is > obvious!!! (sigh) There is a perfectly reasonable interpretation of > the judges post, so why the big fuss about it? I can't speak for Richard, but my intent was just a little good-natured ribbing to warm up. It's obvious what the Judge meant; but if one takes it literally, it's subject to considerable mock argument. I'm sorry that didn't come across. > This committee is most fun when academic pedantry is confined to the > action *within* a round. When it's serious, yes. -Jesse -- Rule Date: 2002-06-13 19:52:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST