Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt_at_gulbrandsen.priv.no)
Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 09:01:06 PDT

• Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Aron Wall: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• In reply to: Aron Wall: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3CFCE2E2.24A0E489_at_wall.org>
X-RCPT-TO: <jessw_at_netwood.net>
X-UIDL: 2419
Status: U

"Only A if B" is a perfectly well-formed way of saying that out of a set
of consequences, only A happens as a result of condition B being true.

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-04 15:59:07 GMT

• Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Aron Wall: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• In reply to: Aron Wall: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST