Re: 185:10: VALID, 0.0

From: Factitious (x40_at_pacbell.net)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 14:57:10 PDT

Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
Previous message: Alan Riddell: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
In reply to: Alan Riddell: "Re: 185:10: VALID, 0.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Alan Riddell wrote:

> 0 is negative now...  oh well

Fine by me.  I tend towards the view that zero is positive and negative.

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-03 21:55:18 GMT

Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
Previous message: Alan Riddell: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
In reply to: Alan Riddell: "Re: 185:10: VALID, 0.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 14 2008 - 00:00:01 PDT