From: Glenn & Chrystal Overby (guardcaptain_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2002 - 09:18:09 PDT
<rule> My colleague is right. I am indeed Righteous and Conceited. However, his call is just...if not stylish...so I shall also post a Rule. But I would first point out that the reference in Rule 185:1 to an obscure Texas Libertarian politician borders on defaming the Congressman in question. The Honorable Ron Paul was elected as a Republican member of Congress, not a Libertarian. I am certain that in Republican circles calling the honorable member a Libertarian is injurious to his reputation. :) I disagree with my un-Righteous and non-Conceited Modest Predecessor about style. EVERYTHING is a matter of style. (See http://home.earthlink.net/~guardcaptain/Style.html) Committee members should get off their bums and more aggressively judge style. Therefore, any Rule may be declared Sucky by the Committee's passing a Proposal to that effect. If a Rule is declared Sucky, it must be declared INVALID by the Judge, as we can't afford Sucky Rules when we also have sleepy members. </rule> Glenn E. Overby II Tilton, Illinois, USA -- Rule Date: 2002-06-01 16:21:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST