RE: 174 over?

From: Jonathan Van Matre (JVanMatre_at_oslp.com)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 11:48:30 PST

• Next message: Anton Cox: "RE: 174 over?"
• Previous message: Stephen Turner: "174 over?"
• Maybe in reply to: Stephen Turner: "174 over?"
• Next in thread: Anton Cox: "RE: 174 over?"
• Reply: Anton Cox: "RE: 174 over?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well, I haven't seen a rule.  I really didn't think 174:5 would prove to
be such a round-killer.  I suppose we should await official word from
the Judge, though -- perhaps he received one directly.

--Jonathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:sret1_at_ntlworld.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:16 PM
> To: Fantasy Rules Committee
> Subject: 174 over?
>
>
> Was there a rule after 174:5? If not, it looks to me like
> round 174 petered
> out with JVM the Wizard Judge for the next round.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
> "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7
> matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-01-15 19:16:16 GMT
>

--
Rule Date: 2002-01-17 19:54:15 GMT

• Next message: Anton Cox: "RE: 174 over?"
• Previous message: Stephen Turner: "174 over?"
• Maybe in reply to: Stephen Turner: "174 over?"
• Next in thread: Anton Cox: "RE: 174 over?"
• Reply: Anton Cox: "RE: 174 over?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST