176:9 INVALID, -1.0

From: Stephen Turner (sret1_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 09:22:11 PST


176:9                                                        INVALID  -1.0
Alan Riddell                                       Wed 2002-02-06 15:17:10
>>>>>

Define the fantasy number m such that,
m+j = j+m = a
0*m = m*0 = m
and for any real number y,
m+y = y+m = m

then,

(m+j)*0 = a*0 = 0
but,
m*0 + j*0 = m + 1 = m

but m is not zero. Therefore addition is not distributive even under
multiplication by a non-fantasy number.

Also, define the fantasy number k such that, for all numbers non zero
numbers y then
|k| < |y|
k > 0
and if y is real,
k*y = y*k = k
k+k = k
k*k = k
y+k = k+y
<<<<<

Judgement: Fails in the same way as 176:8, by using the word "zero". Also,
doesn't use "QED" as demanded by 176:2.

Style: There are some good things about this rule. I still like the notion
of introducing more fantasy numbers, although these ones have really weird
properties! And using the number a is cute.
  However, this rule also has the appearance of being written in haste. It
is invalid in careless ways. And although it progresses the game by making
new maths, it doesn't (at least explicitly) constrain future rules. Lastly
you got your rule number wrong in the header of your mail. Weighing it all
up, I balance it out slightly negative, at -1.0.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROUND 176                             Round start: Wed 2002-01-30 15:32:50

Player                 Style       Valid until
------                 -----       -----------
Ed Murphy              - 0.5       Mon 2002-02-11 22:23:30
Rich Holmes            + 2.0       Fri 2002-02-08 02:42:41
Factitious             + 4.0       Thu 2002-02-07 00:23:06
Jonathan Van Matre     - 2.5       Wed 2002-02-06 18:03:06
Others                   0        (Wed 2002-02-06 15:32:50)
Alan Riddell           + 1.0      (Tue 2002-02-05 16:50:44)
James Willson          - 2.0      (Tue 2002-02-05 15:32:50)

All times are in GMT and base ten.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule    By whom               When                        Judgement  Style
----    -------               ----                        ---------  -----
176:1   Alan Riddell          Wed 2002-01-30 16:50:44     VALID      + 2.0
176:2   Jonathan Van Matre    Wed 2002-01-30 18:03:06     VALID      - 2.5
176:3   Ed Murphy             Wed 2002-01-30 19:44:52     VALID      - 1.5
176:4   Factitious            Fri 2002-02-01 00:23:06     VALID      + 2.0
176:5   Rich Holmes           Fri 2002-02-01 02:42:41     VALID      + 2.0
176:6   Ed Murphy             Mon 2002-02-04 22:23:30     VALID      + 1.0
176:7   James Willson         Tue 2002-02-05 08:51:33     INVALID    - 2.0
176:8   Factitious            Wed 2002-02-06 05:37:10     INVALID    + 2.0
176:9   Alan Riddell          Wed 2002-02-06 15:17:10     INVALID    - 1.0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

--
Rule Date: 2002-02-06 17:22:26 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST