From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 10:23:49 PST
Tieka wrote: > The difficulty of interpeting fyaphic words can be illustrated by the > curious case of the fyaphic bracfiveZ'skets Zzzzz. At first, it appears that > this fyaphic is merely 5 Z's and thus would be a zwammerbund. Looking closer > at it, we see that it is actually a splitsplotsplinksplonk. Thus, the true > interpetation would be brac3Z'sinmiddleof2Z'skets. To deal with this > confusion, future rules will not contain fyaphics with duplicated letters. > > Tieka > -- > A hungry cat has no snooze button. > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-04-02 16:02:21 GMT I think this rule was posted under the assumption that I would find the last rule INVALID, so that no 1942 Vladistok phone book reference (or reinterpretation of othernomicreference) was included. INVALID. Style: +2 for a brilliant reinterpretation of the very idea of reinterpretation. The Judge. -- Rule Date: 2002-04-02 18:23:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST