Re: Proposal 180:A

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 09:48:07 PST

• Next message: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:6"
• Previous message: Tieka: "180:7"
• In reply to: Alan Riddell: "Re: Proposal 180:A"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: Proposal 180:A"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: Proposal 180:A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Alan Riddell wrote:

> >I shall treat the rule as INVALID on the presumption that this proposal
> >will
> >pass unless it doesn't look like it will pass.
>
> Something curious about this proposal in that he will still be eligible for
> another week.

How so?

--
Rule Date: 2002-04-02 17:47:45 GMT

• Next message: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:6"
• Previous message: Tieka: "180:7"
• In reply to: Alan Riddell: "Re: Proposal 180:A"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: Proposal 180:A"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: Proposal 180:A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST