Re: 170:4 (the real one) is delayed

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt_at_gulbrandsen.priv.no)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 15:32:34 PDT

• Next message: Factitious: "Re: 170:4- Why are we wasting away?"
• Previous message: Ed Murphy: "170:4 (the real one) is delayed"
• In reply to: Ed Murphy: "170:4 (the real one) is delayed"
• Next in thread: Factitious: "Re: 170:5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I can confirm that such a message was received on Monday, and if you want
I can dig out the exact time. I'm afraid I can't access the contents any
more.

--Arnt

--
Rule Date: 2001-10-13 22:30:29 GMT

• Next message: Factitious: "Re: 170:4- Why are we wasting away?"
• Previous message: Ed Murphy: "170:4 (the real one) is delayed"
• In reply to: Ed Murphy: "170:4 (the real one) is delayed"
• Next in thread: Factitious: "Re: 170:5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 07 2008 - 09:00:01 PDT