170:3 Judgement

From: Factitious (x40_at_pacbell.net)
Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 22:11:02 PDT


Mark Nau wrote:

> 170:3------------------Let unwilling lawmakers undermine lexical
> length limitation. Unless last legislation unwilling, law length
> unlimited.------------------Mark Nau

Validity:
    An attempt to undermine 170:2?  Well, as long as they're unwilling
lawmakers, and of course, "let them legislate" was pretty permissive
language.  VALID.

Style:
    Maintains brevity, even after demonstrating a way to avoid it: +1.2
.  Nice interpretation of 170:2 : +1.  Doesn't provide much of a
restriction, though: -1.  Total: +1.2

    As an aside, I didn't see a rule date on the bottom of this rule.
Did anyone else receive the official date?  If it can't be determined,
is there an accepted precedent for calculating elgibility?

--
Rule Date: 2001-10-09 05:12:34 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST