From: Anton Cox (A.G.Cox_at_city.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 09:37:36 PDT
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Glenn Overby II wrote: > .... I do not know the > precedents of the Committee on a withdrawn Proposal, if there are > any. My instinct, and common sense, would treat 165:A, clearly > written in error, as though it had never been proposed. But we all > know that common sense sometimes has nothing to do with FRC. > Advice? I think there is a precedent for withdrawing the proposal, though off the top of my head I cant give a specific example. (And we still have his 169:B to raise a smile, at least for now.) > 169:A > FOR: Rich > AGAINST: Tripper, Glenn I vote AGAINST this proposal for the (non-pedantic) reason given earlier. > 169:B > FOR: Aron > AGAINST: Glenn I'm tempted to vote yes for this one... but I think I will wait for Aron to withdraw it instead. Anton -- Rule Date: 2001-10-03 16:36:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST