Re: 169:A

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 07:36:18 PDT


"Gallivanting Tripper" <flix_os_at_hotmail.com> writes:

> -----169:A-------
> That the rule which the Judge has re-labeled 169:15 but whose author labeled
> it 169:14 be declared VALID.
> ----------------

I vote FOR this proposal.

--
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY

--
Rule Date: 2001-10-03 14:36:23 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST