165:A

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 22:59:40 PDT 

Glenn Overby II wrote:


Perhaps a vote is where this

> =should= go.
>
> Da Judge

Your request is granted.  :-)

-----165:A-------
That the rule which the Judge has re-labeled 165:17 but whose author labeled it 165:16
be declared VALID.
----------------

Well, I could hardly just say 165:17, but 165:16 leaves an ambiguity, so this is what I
wrote. :->

I vote FOR this proposal.

Aron Wall

--
Rule Date: 2001-10-03 06:00:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST