From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 22:59:40 PDT
Glenn Overby II wrote: Perhaps a vote is where this > =should= go. > > Da Judge Your request is granted. :-) -----165:A------- That the rule which the Judge has re-labeled 165:17 but whose author labeled it 165:16 be declared VALID. ---------------- Well, I could hardly just say 165:17, but 165:16 leaves an ambiguity, so this is what I wrote. :-> I vote FOR this proposal. Aron Wall -- Rule Date: 2001-10-03 06:00:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST