Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0
From: Anton Cox (A.G.Cox_at_city.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 04:15:17 PDT
- Next message: Jesse F. W: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Previous message: Mary K. Kuhner: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- In reply to: Mary K. Kuhner: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. W: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Reply: Jesse F. W: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Mary K. Kuhner wrote:
> ... All of us have commited botched rules, misguided
> rules, rules that caused more trouble than they were worth,
> rules invalidated by their own restrictions....
I even managed to cause great howls of disapproval by attempting to
*not* submit a rule...
Best Wishes,
Anton
--
Rule Date: 2001-08-24 11:16:10 GMT
- Next message: Jesse F. W: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Previous message: Mary K. Kuhner: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- In reply to: Mary K. Kuhner: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. W: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Reply: Jesse F. W: "Re: 167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST