Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0

From: Christopher Bartlett (bridgeweaver_at_mediaone.net)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 09:51:34 PDT

Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Previous message: Jesse F. W: "Yet another rule"
Maybe in reply to: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Do I incorrectly read one of the strictures of 167:12 to limit rules to 25
words or less?  If not, then 167:17 must be ruled invalid.

     Kitt Bartlett

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-23 16:52:33 GMT

Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Previous message: Jesse F. W: "Yet another rule"
Maybe in reply to: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 29 2008 - 12:00:01 PDT