Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5

From: Jeremy D. Selengut (selengut_at_nih.gov)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 07:22:55 PDT


At 07:49 AM 8/22/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>as I understand the difference in definition between invalid and
>unsuccessful, my attempted genetic modification rule, which was submitted
>near the same time as, and before I had read the modification rule that was
>approved should be ruled unsuccessful.  I agree it is inconsistent, and I
>knew that as soon as I read the approved rule, however I had not seen that
>rule until after submitting mine.
>
>      Kitt Bartlett


Kitt:

         You sent in your rule 167:11 at 18:54:10.  I received Rule 167:8
at 18:20:35, 12 seconds after it was sent out by the FRC mailer.  I think
34 minutes is ample time for 167:8 to have reached you.  It does not matter
if you did not read it before you submitted your rule, only whether you had
the opportunity to have read it if you had wanted to do so.  I your mail
system actually did not receive rule 167:8 before 18:54:10, please forward
a copy of the mail with the appropriate time-stamps in it, and I will
reconsider.

-TWJ

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-22 14:23:43 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST